looney tunes

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

miércoles, 30 de octubre de 2013

Village of the Damned (1960)

Posted on 17:00 by Unknown

Running Time: 77 minutes
Directed By: Wolf Rilla
Written By: Stirling Silliphant, Wolf Rilla, Ronald Kinnoch, from novel The Midwich Cuckoos by John Wyndham
Main Cast: George Sanders, Barbara Shelley, Martin Stephens, Michael Gwynn, Laurence Naismith
Click here to view the trailer

FRIGHTFEST 2013: NIGHT SIX

Arriving at the oldest film contained in this year's FRIGHTFEST festivities, we come to the 1960 film "Village of the Damned", which was renamed to lesser avail in 1995, by John Carpenter. I hadn't seen either version and was excited to check this one out.


The film begins interestingly enough with all the citizens of the small, British town of Midwich fainting at exactly the same time, one afternoon. The main character, Gordon Zellaby (Sanders), happens to be on the phone with his brother-in-law when he suddenly drops the receiver and falls to the ground. His brother-in-law, alarmed at Gordon's sudden disappearance, heads to Midwich and, through a series of discoveries, realizes that whenever anyone crosses the line into Midwich, they faint. A few hours later, however, everyone wakes up, just assuming they've fallen suddenly fallen asleep for some strange reason. After about two months, another strange occurrence happens, as all the women suddenly become pregnant. Some women, like Gordon's wife Anthea (Shelley) is ecstatic about the impending birth of her and Gordon's first child. Others, like a married woman who's husband has just returned home after twelve months, are accused of infidelity and are shamed. When the children are born, it is discovered that they all weigh just over ten pounds, they were all born with strange eyes and that they're all a little more advanced than they should be. It is also discovered later, that the children seem to have some sort of link, whereas when one of them learns something, they all do. After a while, the children grow to a walking age and it also becomes apparent that their glowing eyes can control the will of grown men. If they want something to happen, all they need do is stare at you, with their shiny, glowing eyes and they will get what they desire. It later becomes apparent that the children must be destroyed.


I didn't have too many problems with this movie, but I didn't go crazy for it either. In my opinion, the film had a lot of potential early on, with the fainting residents of Midwich and even the plot twist of all the women in town becoming pregnant. But I'd seen advertisements for this movie before and even the 1995 version and I knew that the film had something to do with children as the villains and their glowing eyes. In a perfect world (for my money anyway) we'd have just kept the town of Midwich fainted and rode that train to the end. What made everyone faint? How can we get people in there to get them awake, without the people we send in fainting? This could've been very interesting, sort of like "Under the Dome" but without the dome. I've always said that I don't like films with children in the main roles and this is really no exception, however, I didn't loathe the film or anything. It's just that it didn't seem to have enough high points and featured too much talking from the main characters. If you think about it, the only real shocking moments in this movie are the two occasions where the children use their glowing stare for evil: 1) when they force a man to wreck his car and 2) when they force a man to shoot himself. That's really it. Add in maybe three or four more of these moments and spread them out a little and I think we have a winner. As it is, I'll keep this review short and call it a mediocre time at the movies.


RATING: 6/10  Remember, tomorrow is not only the conclusion of FRIGHTFEST, but will also be the very first SIN OF OMISSION film. What is a Sin of Omission film? Well, there will be a hefty paragraph tomorrow explaining all the details, as I unveil the conclusion to the FRIGHTFEST festivities and I'll go ahead and tell you now that the film is a '10/10'!

October 30, 2013  1:44pm

Read More
Posted in Wolf Rilla | No comments

martes, 29 de octubre de 2013

Dawn of the Dead (2004)

Posted on 17:00 by Unknown

Running Time: 100 minutes
Directed By: Zack Snyder
Written By: James Gunn, from story by George A. Romero
Main Cast: Sarah Polley, Ving Rhames, Jake Weber, Mekhi Phifer, Michael Kelly
Click here to view the trailer

FRIGHTFEST 2013: NIGHT FIVE

In the words of Christopher Walken: "WOW, Wowie Wow Wow Wow". I have to tell you, I'm real skeptical of any horror movie that's come down the pike since, say the year 2000, but this was something special and proved that Zack Snyder's push into the limelight, wasn't for nothing.


Fans of the blog should know the story of "Dawn of the Dead", since it was only last year (right around this same time, as a matter of fact) that I reviewed the original, Romero version of the film. However, for the newcomers, I'll gloss over the good stuff and we'll get on with the show. Zombies are overtaking the world! We focus in on young, good looking, married nurse Ana (Polley), as she arrives home from a shift that went an hour too long, to meet her husband in the comforts of their married bed and catch the tail end of American Idol. In the middle of the night, a neighbor girl (probably about eight years old or so) is noticed standing at the entrance to their bedroom door, blood dripping from her mouth. Ana's husband, concerned, rushes to the girl's aid, not realizing that she's been transformed into one of the undead. He's bitten! It only takes a few moments for him to turn into one of the wild eyed creatures from hell and within about thirty seconds he's attacking Ana, forcing her to barricade herself inside the bathroom, covered with the blood from her husband's...former husband's gaping neck wound. She manages to get to the car and drive off, realizing that the streets are overrun with flesh eating mosters: Welcome to "Dawn of the Dead". Meeting up with a few other survivors: Ken (Rhames), Michael (Weber), Andre (Phifer) and Andre's pregnant girlfriend, the group hole up in a shopping mall, firearms in hand and wait for help to arrive...but outside, zombies (a word we never hear in the film) pound at the glass doors, as their numbers multiply.

Me to my wife, during the film: "If that pregnant woman gets turned into a zombie and her unborn baby bursts from stomach, as a little, undead zombie, I'll give this movie a 10".


Well, it didn't exactly happen like that, but I'll be damned if I didn't get the zombie baby I'd always wanted!! Seriously though, who isn't skeptical of recent horror movies. They're all cut from the same pattern, they all have cheap thrills and barely creepy effects and for the most part, they're all as dull as dry toast, trying their damndest to do something to make you jump, when all you really want to do is jump into a better flick. However, here comes Zack Snyder to save the day and give us a kick ass zombie movie, that also brings the quality goods. I realized within the first fifteen minutes that this movie was something special and wasn't just going to be another one of those modern pieces of horror rubbish. A few POV shots and an aerial shot of Ana's town in blazes and chaos made me realize that I was in for a treat, by someone who knew how to be a good host. Because when you think about it, that's what film director's are, they're party hosts and if you enjoy their movie, then they're a good host and otherwise, they're a not so good host and I'm here to tell you that as far as "Dawn of the Dead" is concerned, Zack Snyder gave me a chance to party hard, let my hair down and have a good time, without feeling ashamed at liking something that isn't usually likable.


There's literally no reason to not like this film. The snobs can laud it as a modern horror masterpiece, while Snyder gives the casual, shallow movie goers something to "ooh" and "AHHH!" at. You have firearms galore, chainsaws, explosions, decapitations, blood by the buckets, tricked out buses and did I mention a ZOMBIE freakin' BABY!! Oh yeah and the ending is great too! You obviously have a very talented filmmaker here, having fun and that's probably why the results were so great. He took an original story and made it his own, while still paying homage to the original. Raise your hands if you'd have liked to have seen him tackle all three or Romero's original zombie flicks. I would've been totally down for that, leaving "Dawn of the Dead" as it is, remaking "Night of the Living Dead" as a modern black & white picture and really sprucing up "Day of the Dead", straying further away from the original than the other three. It's a pipe dream, but it could've been cool and kept Halloween time at the box office a bit more quality, instead of the atrocities that are being committed today with a "Carrie" remake (did we really need another one) and Insidious 2 (because no horror movie can end at part 1!).

RATING: 9/10  Great, great stuff and highly recommended. If you haven't seen this one, I can understand any skepticism, but trust me...it's good!

October 29, 2013  8:00pm

Read More
Posted in Zack Snyder | No comments

517. M*A*S*H (1970)

Posted on 10:20 by Unknown

Running Time: 116 minutes
Directed By: Robert Altman
Written By: Ring Lardner Jr., from novel by Richard Hooker
Main Cast: Donald Sutherland, Elliott Gould, Tom Skerritt, Sally Kellerman, Robert Duvall
Click here to view the trailer

ALTMAN WEEK: CHAPTER I

Well FRIGHTFEST 2013 is just about in the bag (actually, all the FRIGHTFEST posts are up and scheduled to post at 8pm, for the next three nights, so for me FRIGHTFEST is kind of over) and it's time to start up a new festivity: "Altman Week". I know I said "Scorsese Week" was going to be the final director tribute week, but after looking THE BOOK over, I realized that there's still a few opportunities with director weeks left, so I figured "why not". Plus, these are great to do when I hit the halfway mark of a season, which is exactly where we are now. It's also worth noting that I'm OFFICIALLY 3/4 of the way finished with THE BOOK! Anyway, "MASH"...


Truth be told, there's really no linear, point A to point B plot here. Of course, we all probably know the story of "MASH", as it was spun-off into a very popular television show. In fact, the MASH finale still stands as the highest rated American television broadcast of all-time, with something like 125 million viewers. Now me, being a sitcom junkie (I bet you didn't know that about me), a guy who will literally give ANY sitcom at least one shot, has never seen one full episode of "MASH" and that's because I've always loathed war stuff and I think readers of the blog already know that. It's not because I'm a "give peace a chance" nut, it's just because war and war life themes have never had ANY interest for me, none whatsoever. So it wasn't a surprise that I didn't really care for this movie either. The plot revolves around a mobile hospital unit, operating during the Korean War. Your main characters are the doctors and nurses that make up the unit and the hijinks they get into. When Major Margaret Houlihan (Kellerman) joins the operation, she's dubbed "Hot Lips" and given rough treatment by the men. Donald Sutherland and Elliott Gould (two that I don't mind) make up the rest of the cast, but in my view, their talents are really wasted here.


I don't know, maybe it's because the types of people (men) that probably enjoy this movie, are the same types of people (men) that I don't think I'd get along with. Overly patriotic, war nuts who also enjoy football and giving their female co-workers a hard time. I mean, isn't that the epitome of the American bully? I'm not saying this film's only audience is that type, but I bet it makes up the core, especially in the 70s when the film came out. No, it just wasn't for me, not in the least and as much as I tried to like it, I just couldn't settle into it. I liked the cast, as it was a bunch of guys that I normally enjoy, but I couldn't even, as much as I tried, enjoy that. Sure, there were a few bits that I got lost in: the dentist's wish to commit suicide and the finale football game were decent attention keepers, but that's it and had it not been for THE BOOK, I'd have probably NEVER seen this.


RATING: 4/10  That's about as high as it gets for this one. I do have high hopes for some of Altman's work though and I can tell you now that I've seen "Short Cuts" before and really liked it. Anyway, not a great start, but there's five more...

MOVIES WATCHED: 751
MOVIES LEFT TO WATCH: 250

October 29, 2013  1:18pm

Read More
Posted in Robert Altman | No comments

lunes, 28 de octubre de 2013

Pumpkinhead (1988)

Posted on 17:00 by Unknown

Running Time: 86 minutes
Directed By: Stan Winston
Written By: Mark Patrick Carducci, Stan Winston, Richard Weinman, Gary Gerani
Main Cast: Lance Henriksen, Jeff East, John D'Aquino, Kimberly Ross, Joel Hoffman
Click here to view the trailer

FRIGHTFEST 2013: NIGHT FOUR

Several points to make here in the opening paragraph: 1) I can't believe it took four people to write such an amazing pile of crap 2) I can't believe this movie is actually getting time on a blog that was originally intended to house 1001 "must see" movies and 3) I plan to have a lot of fun with this review!


Okay, so the film stars Lance Henriksen, which was the main reason I said "okay" when my wife suggested we watch it for FRIGHTFEST. While I can't pinpoint a particular performance I enjoyed Henriksen in, I've always dug the guy and he's someone who seems to crop up in horror movies, probably because he's one scary mofo. Here Henriksen is Ed Harley, a "good 'ol boy" with a cute kid named Billy. Ed owns a grocery store and one day, while manning the store, with Billy and his dog Gypsy playing outside, a group of teens (very typical, horror movie type teens with a 4:2 girl:boy ratio) drive up, on their way to the cabin for the weekend (note the insanely original writing and my insane use of sarcasm). Of course, no group of teenagers would be complete without a resident prick and this group is no exception. Here, Joel (D'Aquino) is the jerk of the crew and while being a rebel and riding his motor bike around the nearby premises', he accidentally hits and kills Ed's son. Oh, I forgot to mention that Ed had stepped out for just a minute, to fetch some feed for a customer. When Ed returns he's pissed, but not quite as pissed off as you'd think he'd be (seriously, watch the movie - Henriksen doesn't play the scene well at all). Anyway, Ed wants revenge, so he finds the old witch who lives in the mountains and asks her to conjure up Punpkinhead - a demon who, for a fee, will get your revenge for you. Yes, a DEMON who fights crime!! So Ed pays (in what seems to be silver coins) and Pumpkinhead is unleashed, chasing the teens through the woods, in typical slasher, horror fashion. However, after a bit, Ed begins to feel remorse for asking for revenge on the teens that killed his son, so he tries to hunt down Pumpkinhead to stop him.


For fans of this film, do you know WHY Ed feels remorse and starts to hunt Pumpkinhead? Because if this plot development doesn't happen, then after Ed hires Pumpkinhead, we no longer need the Henriksen character, because after that point, the conflict exists solely between Pumpkinhead and the teenagers (actually, they're probably more like twenty-somethings). So the writers (all four of them!) conjure up something for Lance to do, so that they don't waste a lot of money on the only star to be found in the picture. Speaking of that conflict between Pumpkinhead and the teens: whose side are we supposed to be on? I mean, I realize that Joel was really the only bad seed of the group, but why wouldn't we want Pumpkinhead to punish the group responsible for coming into the woods and disrupting shit to the point that Ed Harley, respected town citizen, had to call upon the spirit of an age old demon to kick some ass?! I mean, everything was fine until they showed up. No need to wake Pumpkinhead from his slumber or anything! So, do I root for the demon to rid the backwoods of these loud mouth, city citizens or do I root for the unrootable teens? Also, why Pumpkinhead? I mean, I realize they dug him up out of a pumpkin patch graveyard (yep, a PUMPKIN PATCH GRAVEYARD!) but, his head, in no way, resembles a pumpkin. He looks more like a Predator rip off. Ah man, remember "Predator" - if memory serves THAT was a bad ass movie! This, on the other hand, not worth the celluloid it was filmed on.

SPOILER ALERT!


Anything good to report? Well, they did a good job of establishing the bond between the father and son in such a quick amount of time. It's literally about two scenes and we're fully aware that if something happens to this boy, Ed is going to lose his shit. The ending was pretty cool too. No, not the 'Ed Harley shooting himself in order to kill Pumpkinhead' ending (that was just stupid and didn't make a lick of sense). No, I'm talking about the fact that now Ed Harley has become the new Pumpkinhead - that's kinda' cool, I guess. Henriksen was really good too though; his performance probably only suffered because of the crap he was given to work with. You can't polish a turd folks! The film is just WAY too rushed, unoriginal, nonsensical and with the exception of Henriksen, terribly acted.

RATING: 2/10  I can't even justify why this film doesn't get a '1', it just seems more like a '2' to me. However, whether it's a '1' or a '2', it all spells B-A-D. On the other hand, I don't regret watching this one for FRIGHTFEST, because it was your typical, old school, bad horror movie, the wife and I had a blast making fun of it and it seemed to fit with the impending "holiday".

October 28, 2013  8:00pm

Read More
Posted in Stan Winston | No comments

domingo, 27 de octubre de 2013

877. Les Roseaux sauvages/The Wild Reeds (1994)

Posted on 20:34 by Unknown

Running Time: 113 minutes
Directed By: Andre Techine
Written By: Olivier Massart, Gilles Taurand, Andre Techine
Main Cast: Elodie Bouchez, Gael Morel, Stephane Rideau, Frederic Gorny, Michele Moretti
Click here to view the trailer

SEXUAL AWAKENING

This one has been sitting on my desk for a good two weeks or so now, just staring at me, as I kept putting it off and putting it off, sort of knowing that it wouldn't be the type of film that suited me. What can I say - I know my tastes...


I'm not gonna' lie, I sort of mentally checked out of this one at about the halfway mark, stopped caring about the story and just sort of mildly marveled at the cinematography, which I found to the the film's saving grace, if it had one. I just couldn't form any sort of emotional attachment to this picture and I'll take the blame for that one. The film was set primarily at a boarding school and revolves around four youths: Francois (Morel), a shy, Michael Cera looking boy; Serge (Rideau), a more outgoing boy, whose brother dies in the Algerian War; Henri (Gorny), an older boy and Maite, Francois' best friend, a female. The film basically revolves around Francois and his confusion at his own sexuality. He has a sexual encounter with Serge, who seduces him and spends the rest of the film trying to figure out his own preferences. Meanwhile, Henri shows an attraction toward Maite. Honestly, that's all I'm going to be able to muster, because as far as I'm concerned, that was the plot. There wasn't much to it and if there was, it was my own fault for zoning out and missing anything poignant that may have been buried in there. However, as I said, I just couldn't settle into this one, for some reason.

I have found recently though that I'm becoming more and more fascinated with foreign landscapes and architecture. It's not just any foreign scenery either, as it tends to mostly be European sites that seem to catch my eye and leave me gawking at certain things that others might not find beautiful at all. I'm talking about old, paint chipped buildings; miles and miles of rolling, green fields; landmarks that have seemingly been in place for a dozen centuries, it's all very interesting and awesome to me - meaning it inspires awe.


As for this movie, take a pass and thank me later. It just seems to be too quiet to really catch anyone's attention and it's subject matter isn't interesting enough to elicit any sort of any real emotion connection, at least from me anyway. I will give Techine credit for being able to make his film really feel like it's from a different period. The film is set in 1962 and honestly, this film doesn't resemble anything else that was produced in the 90s, so there's that too. Otherwise, thumbs down from this reviewer.

RATING: 3/10  For the few things I mentioned, I'll gladly give it a '3' and say I tried my best, but just couldn't form the emotional attachment necessary to enjoy it more. My fault...

MOVIES WATCHED: 750
MOVIES LEFT TO WATCH: 251

October 27, 2013  11:30pm

Read More
Posted in Andre Techine | No comments

The Collector (1965)

Posted on 17:00 by Unknown

Running Time: 119 minutes
Directed By: William Wyler
Written By: John Kohn, Stanley Mann, Terry Southern, from novel by John Fowles
Main Cast: Terence Stamp, Samantha Eggar
Click here to view the trailer

FRIGHTFEST 2013: NIGHT THREE

It was an anonymous poster who came to the blog and said "I recommend William Wyler's The Collector for Frightfest" and it was faithful Ray who seconded the nomination. While I wouldn't go so far as to call "The Collector" an out and out horror movie, I am grateful for their insistence that I watch it!


The film has two stars and really only three (including the neighbor) notable cast members, with everyone else playing the role of extra or glorified extra (that is, extra with a line or two). The film's main is Frederick Clegg (Stamp), an amateur entomologist, professional bank teller and socially awkward misfit, whom, upon the film's opening, is purchasing a house in a secluded area. If you're wondering where Freddie has gotten the money to purchase this house, he's apparently just won a lottery - something called "football pools", which is apparently exclusive to England, where the film is set. The winnings also give Freddie the means to carry out his master plan: kidnapping a girl. He selects a very specific girl, Miranda (Eggar), a girl that he used to ride the bus with at school and one who never gave him the time of day. He stalks her in his van and when the time is right, uses a chloroform soaked rag to render her unconscious, taking her back to his new house, which incidentally is equipped with a sound proof cellar. Arriving back at his place, we learn that he's gone to a lot of trouble, tidying up the cellar and making it look like a small apartment, complete with a whole new wardrobe of clothes, that he hopes will fit her. He tells her that he loves her, that he's always loved her and that his hopes in kidnapping her being that she will fall in love with him. He makes a deal with her: If she doesn't try to escape, if she talks to him (actually converses with him) and if she promises to eat the meals he brings her, he'll let her go in four weeks. The film is filled with suspenseful climax cues and some great back & forth between the prisoner and her captor.

SPOILER ALERT!


This film just goes to show you that there are thousands of cinematic gems out there, just waiting to be consumed by the movie lover. I hadn't even heard of this picture before it was suggested to me by the anonymous poster, but now I've heard of it and loved it! So I guess a hearty "thank you" to the poster that suggested the film is in order: Thank you!

Everything was just perfect, from beginning to end, they never took a misstep that I disapproved of and even the ending was just perfect. Let's face it, there were several choices on how to end this movie. 1) You have the girl escape to the authorities, report Clegg, thus seeing him arrested. I kind of thought this was where they were headed, as there was some minimal narration that came at the beginning and end and I kind of thought we were listening to Clegg's story from his padded cell. 2) Have the girl actually fall in love with him. Again, this is something I thought they were heading for and am so glad they didn't do. How awful would that have been? I guess those were really the only two foreseeable options, as the third would be having the girl die and having Clegg succeed, which is what happened. However, the way it all went down was just perfect. You couldn't have Clegg just kill Miranda, because he loved her. So she's killed when she's left to starve and freeze in the cellar, while Clegg is at the hospital, getting treated for a wound she inflicts on him. And then the cherry on top, having the film's ultimate end be Clegg stalking another girl, preparing to go through the cycle all over again.


Here's the question though: Whose side are we supposed to be on? Am I the only one who found myself urging the nosy neighbor to JUST LEAVE, before the water came rushing down the stairs - the water that Miranda had forced on with her big toe, hoping to draw the attention of whomever came to visit Clegg? I certainly wasn't urging the neighbor to JUST STAY A LITTLE LONGER, while the water made it's way to his line of vision. I think it was a movie where I didn't care so much about the outcomes of the characters, as much as I just wanted to see all of the pieces fit together to make for a really good movie. As long as Miranda is tied up and helpless, this movie continues and I get to bask in it for a little while longer, to see a few more suspenseful pieces and to see a little more brilliance from Terence Stamp. I have to say, speaking of Stamp, I loved the casting choices and the fact that there were really only two cast members. I'm a sucker for a film that could easily be a stage play, though, ironically, I've never seen a live stage play. One last thought and if this thought is a popular one, I promise I've seen it nowhere: Is there some sort of connection between this movie and "The Silence of the Lambs"? I'm talking about the butterfly/moth stuff, not just the obvious "guy holds a girl captive" thing. The butterfly thing in both films, as well as the obvious parallels between the plot lines just seemed odd to me, that's all. Anyway, damn fine film!

RATING: 8.5/10  I can't go whole hog and I really don't know why. I think it's like that first date with a girl you really like and you really don't want to end up in bed at the end of the night, because you don't want to rush things and end up screwing something up. Doesn't matter though, great movie - end of story.

October 27, 2013  8:00pm

Read More
Posted in William Wyler | No comments

sábado, 26 de octubre de 2013

Day of the Dead (1985)

Posted on 17:00 by Unknown

Running Time: 102 minutes
Directed By: George A. Romero
Written By: George A. Romero
Main Cast: Lori Cardille, Terry Alexander, Joseph Pilato, Jarlath Conroy, Anthony Dileo Jr.
Click here to view the trailer

FRIGHTFEST 2013: NIGHT TWO

"Day of the Dead" sort of hits close to home, as it not only features make-up and special effects by Tom Savini, a Pittsburgh native (only sixty miles or so from me), but also stars Lori Cardille as the main character, daughter of long time Pittsburgh broadcaster Bill Cardille, nicknamed "Chilly Billy" for his hosting duties on Chiller Theatre, an old Saturday night horror movie program that aired in the Pittsburgh area. Bill also appeared in the original "Night of the Living Dead", as well as the 1990 remake, directed by Tom Savini.

Anyway...


I'll tell you right now that the film is EASILY the worst when put head to head (to head) with "Night of the Living Dead" and "Dawn of the Dead", but I'll save the opinion column for a little further down the page. The film starts with a pretty eerie dream sequence in which we see the main character, Dr. Sarah Bowman (Cardille), sitting alone in an asylum-type room. Once she snaps back to reality, we learn that the events that began in "Night of the Living Dead" and continued in "Dawn of the Dead" are still taking place and now we zoom in on a small group of survivors, holed up in an underground, military compound. Among the survivors are two, smaller groups: the doctors and the military men, as well as two pilots. The doctors and the military men are always at odds with one another, mainly due to the tyrannical behavior of Captain Rhodes (Pilato). The doctors, fully aware tha
t the humans are outnumbered by the "undead", try doing experiments on them, trying to tame them and possibly domesticate them. The experiments are headed up by a particular doctor, Dr. Logan and his star "pupil", whom he calls Bub, a member of the undead clan whom Dr. Logan has made lots of progress with, teaching him to use a gun and salute the military men. Of course, things go awry...


My biggest problem with "Day of the Dead" was the lack of action and the fact that we really don't get into the humans vs. zombies part of the story until something like the last thirty minutes. Prior to that, the real conflict of this movie isn't the humans vs. the monsters, but the humans vs. each other, as the doctors and the soldiers engage in, what seems like, a never ending war of words. I love, love, love a good zombie flick, but I think most zombie movie lovers would agree that the meat & potatoes of any good zombie flick is the survivalist qualities, the "how are they going to get out of this jam" or the "oh no, there's fifty zombies between him and where he needs to be, let's see how he gets out of this!". I was shocked when I looked on IMDB and saw that this film has a healthy '7.0' rating. You have to figure that the majority of the people rating this are the real horror junkies and in my opinion, this just wasn't up to snuff with other, better horror or even more specifically, other zombie movies - especially Romero's zombie movies.

Otherwise, if you want to get technical, the make-up and effects were pretty B.A., as you can never go wrong with Greg Nicotero and Tom Savini, who know their stuff when it comes to making things look extra f'd up. I've included a few pictures here, but as far as just how gruesome these zombies look, there's no comparison to "Night of" or "Dawn of". Unfortunately, it's a shame that the zombies look the best in a film where they're not at the forefront of the plot for most of the time.



I think I can be quoted, at one time on this blog, as saying I'm not really a horror guy. I've realized recently that that's an absolutely false statement. As much as I didn't care for this on a quality movie level, I have to admit that it was a lot of fun at times and ultimately I had fun watching, even though I had some severe gripes. If you're just looking for a cheap thrill, then this should do the trick. However, if you want quality, like me, then you need to opt for either "Night of" or "Dawn of" and forget "Day of".

RATING: 4/10  Yeah, that's about as good as it gets from me. I just can't go any higher. Had they put the zombies a little more "out there" and made them more prevalent, this would've been fine, but it is what it is. 

October 26, 2013  8:00pm

Read More
Posted in George A. Romero | No comments
Entradas más recientes Entradas antiguas Inicio
Suscribirse a: Entradas (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • 795. Drowning by Numbers (1988)
    Running Time: 118 minutes Directed By: Peter Greenaway Written By: Peter Greenaway Main Cast: Joan Plowright, Juliet Stevenson, Joely Ric...
  • 596. Barry Lyndon (1975)
    Running Time: 184 minutes Directed By: Stanley Kubrick Written By: Stanley Kubrick, from novel by William Makepeace Thackeray Main Cast: ...
  • 709. Narayama bushi-ko/The Ballad of Narayama (1983)
    Running Time: 130 minutes Directed By: Shohei Imamura Written By: Shohei Imamura, from the novel Narayama bushi-ko by Shichiro Fukazawa Ma...
  • 648. Die Blechtrommel/The Tin Drum (1979)
    Running Time: 142 minutes Directed By: Volker Schlondorff Written By: Jean-Claude Carriere, Gunter Grass, Franz Seitz, Volker Schlondorff, f...
  • 723. Idi i smotri/Come and See (1985)
    Running Time: 142 minutes Directed By: Elem Klimov Written By: Ales Adamovich, Elem Klimov Main Cast: Aleksey Kravchenko, Olga Mironova, ...
  • 273. Animal Farm (1954)
    Running Time: 72 minutes Directed By: Joy Batchelor, John Halas Written By: Joy Batchelor, John Halas, Borden Mace, Philip Stapp, Lothar W...
  • 774. Sinnui yauman/A Chinese Ghost Story (1987)
    Running Time: 98 minutes Directed By: Siu-Tung Ching Written By: Kai-Chi Yun, from novel by Songling Pu Main Cast: Leslie Cheung, Joey Wo...
  • 289. Hill 24 Doesn't Answer (1955)
    Running Time: 101 minutes Directed By: Thorold Dickinson Written By: Peter Frye, Zvi Kolitz Main Cast: Edward Mulhare, Michael Wager, Marg...
  • 636. GREASE (1978)
    Running Time: 110 minutes Directed By: Randal Kleiser Written By: Bronte Woodard, Allan Carr, from musical by Jim Jacobs and Warren Casey ...
  • 522. Il giardino dei Finzi-Contini/The Garden of the Finzi-Continis (1970)
    Running Time: 94 minutes Directed By: Vittorio De Sica Written By: Vittorio Bonicelli, from novel by Giorgio Bassani Main Cast: Lino Capol...

Categories

  • Abbas Kiarostami
  • Abel Ferrara
  • Abel Gance
  • Abraham Polonsky
  • Adrian Lyne
  • Agnes Varda
  • Agnieszka Holland
  • Aki Kaurismaki
  • Akira Kurosawa
  • Alain Resnais
  • Albert Lewin
  • Alejandro Amenabar
  • Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu
  • Alexander Hammid
  • Allan Dwan
  • Amos Gitai
  • Amy Heckerling
  • Andre Bonzel
  • Andre Techine
  • Andy Warhol
  • Anh-Hung Tran
  • Anthony Mann
  • Anthony Minghella
  • Arthur Penn
  • Atom Egoyan
  • Barbara Loden
  • Barry Levinson
  • Baz Luhrmann
  • Bela Tarr
  • Benoit Poelvoorde
  • Bernardo Bertolucci
  • Bill Forsyth
  • Billy Wilder
  • Bobby Farrelly
  • Brian De Palma
  • Bruce Conner
  • Bruce Robinson
  • Bryan Singer
  • Budd Boetticher
  • Cameron Crowe
  • Carol Reed
  • Cecil B. DeMille
  • Charles Crichton
  • Charles Laughton
  • Chris Marker
  • Chris Noonan
  • Claire Denis
  • Claude Chabrol
  • Claude Lanzmann
  • Daniele Huillet
  • Danny Boyle
  • Darren Aronofsky
  • David Fincher
  • David Lean
  • David Lynch
  • David O. Russell
  • David Zucker
  • Delbert Mann
  • Dennis Hopper
  • Denys Arcand
  • Don Siegel
  • Edgar Morin
  • Edgar Wright
  • Edward Yang
  • Edward Zwick
  • Elem Klimov
  • Elia Kazan
  • Emir Kusturica
  • Eric Rohmer
  • Fatih Akin
  • Fernando Meirelles
  • Francesco Rosi
  • Francis Ford Coppola
  • Frank Borzage
  • Frank Capra
  • Frank Miller
  • Frank Tashlin
  • Gavin Hood
  • Geoff Murphy
  • Geoffrey Wright
  • George A. Romero
  • George Cukor
  • George Kuchar
  • George Lucas
  • George Miller
  • George Sluizer
  • Germaine Dulac
  • Gillian Armstrong
  • Giuseppe Tornatore
  • Glauber Rocha
  • Godfrey Reggio
  • Gordon Parks
  • Guillermo del Toro
  • Gus Van Sant
  • Guy Maddin
  • Hal Ashby
  • Hal Hartley
  • Hany Abu-Assad
  • Hark Tsui
  • Harry Smith
  • Hayao Miyazaki
  • Henri-Georges Clouzot
  • Herbert J. Biberman
  • Howard Hawks
  • Hsiao-hsien Hou
  • Hugh Hudson
  • Ida Lupino
  • Irvin Kershner
  • Irving Rapper
  • Isao Takahata
  • Jack Arnold
  • Jack Smith
  • Jackie Chan
  • Jacques Becker
  • Jacques Demy
  • Jacques Rivette
  • Jacques Tourneur
  • Jafar Panahi
  • James Benning
  • James Cameron
  • James Ivory
  • James L. Brooks
  • Jean Cocteau
  • Jean Eustache
  • Jean Renoir
  • Jean Rouch
  • Jean Vigo
  • Jean-Daniel Pollet
  • Jean-Marie Straub
  • Jean-Pierre Jeunet
  • Jerry Zucker
  • Jerzy Skolimowski
  • Jim Abrahams
  • Jim Jarmusch
  • Joel Coen
  • John Dahl
  • John Ford
  • John Frankenheimer
  • John Halas
  • John Hughes
  • John Huston
  • John McNaughton
  • John Sayles
  • John Singleton
  • John Sturges
  • John Woo
  • Jonathan Demme
  • Joris Ivens
  • Joseph H. Lewis
  • Joseph L. Mankiewicz
  • Joy Batchelor
  • Julian Schnabel
  • Kaige Chen
  • Katia Lund
  • Katsuhiro Otomo
  • Ken Jacobs
  • Kim Ki-young
  • Kira Muratova
  • Krzysztof Kieslowski
  • Larisa Shepitko
  • Lars von Trier
  • Laurence Olivier
  • Lee Kresel
  • Leslie Arliss
  • Louis Malle
  • Luc Besson
  • Luchino Visconti
  • Luis Bunuel
  • Luis Puenzo
  • M. Night Shyamalan
  • Marc Caro
  • Marcel Camus
  • Marcel Carne
  • Marcel Ophuls
  • Marcel Pagnol
  • Marco Tullio Giordana
  • Marguerite Duras
  • Mario Bava
  • Mark Robson
  • Marleen Gorris
  • Marlon Riggs
  • Martin Brest
  • Martin Scorsese
  • Maurice Pialat
  • Max Ophuls
  • Maya Deren
  • Mel Gibson
  • Melvin Van Peebles
  • Michael Curtiz
  • Michael Mann
  • Michael Tolkin
  • Michael Wadleigh
  • Mike Leigh
  • Mike Newell
  • Mike Nichols
  • Mikheil Kalatozishvili
  • Miklos Jancso
  • Milos Forman
  • Mohsen Makhmalbaf
  • Monte Hellman
  • Nanni Moretti
  • Neil Jordan
  • Nicholas Ray
  • Nicholas Roeg
  • Nick Broomfield
  • Norman Z. McLeod
  • Nuri Bilge Ceylan
  • Oliver Hirschbiegel
  • Oliver Stone
  • Orson Welles
  • Otto Preminger
  • Ousmane Sembene
  • P.J. Hogan
  • Paolo Taviani
  • Paul Auster
  • Paul Schrader
  • Paul Thomas Anderson
  • Paul Verhoeven
  • Pedro Almodovar
  • Peter Farrelly
  • Peter Greenaway
  • Peter Weir
  • Peter Yates
  • Quentin Tarantino
  • Radu Mihaileanu
  • Randal Kleiser
  • Raoul Walsh
  • Raul Ruiz
  • Remy Belvaux
  • Rene Clement
  • Richard Donner
  • Richard Marquand
  • Ridley Scott
  • Rob Minkoff
  • Robert Altman
  • Robert Hamer
  • Robert Rodriguez
  • Robert Siodmak
  • Robert Zemeckis
  • Roberto Rossellini
  • Roger Allers
  • Roland Emmerich
  • Roland Joffe
  • Ron Shelton
  • Ross McElwee
  • Russ Meyer
  • Sam Peckinpah
  • Samuel Fuller
  • Scott Hicks
  • Sean Penn
  • Sergei M. Eisenstein
  • Shirley Clarke
  • Shohei Imamura
  • Siu-Tung Ching
  • Souleymane Cisse
  • Spike Jonze
  • Spike Lee
  • Stan Winston
  • Stanley Kramer
  • Stanley Kubrick
  • Stanley Kwan
  • Stephan Elliott
  • Sydney Pollack
  • Terrence Malick
  • Terry Gilliam
  • Terry Zwigoff
  • Theo Angelopoulos
  • Thorold Dickinson
  • Tian Zhuangzhuang
  • Tobe Hooper
  • Todd Haynes
  • Todd Solondz
  • Tom Tykwer
  • Tony Scott
  • Victor Sjostrom
  • Vincent Gallo
  • Vincente Minnelli
  • Vittorio De Sica
  • Vittorio Taviani
  • Volker Schlondorff
  • Warren Beatty
  • Wayne Wang
  • Wes Anderson
  • Wes Craven
  • William A. Wellman
  • William Friedkin
  • William Wyler
  • Wim Wenders
  • Wolf Rilla
  • Wolfgang Becker
  • Wolfgang Petersen
  • Wong Kar-Wai
  • Woody Allen
  • Yash Chopra
  • Yasujiro Ozu
  • Yimou Zhang
  • Youssef Chahine
  • Zack Snyder

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2014 (78)
    • ▼  julio (13)
      • Bresson Week - COMING SOON
      • 644. My Brilliant Career (1979)
      • 794. Une affaire de femmes/The Story of Women (1988)
      • 289. Hill 24 Doesn't Answer (1955)
      • 637. Days of Heaven (1978)
      • 560. BADLANDS (1973)
      • 522. Il giardino dei Finzi-Contini/The Garden of t...
      • 648. Die Blechtrommel/The Tin Drum (1979)
      • Versatile Blogger Award!
      • SINS OF OMISSION - Entry #10: Sin City (2005)
      • June 2014 Recap
      • 364. La maschera del demonio/Revenge of the Vampir...
      • 541. Two-Lane Blacktop (1971)
    • ►  junio (2)
    • ►  mayo (2)
    • ►  abril (6)
    • ►  marzo (16)
    • ►  febrero (22)
    • ►  enero (17)
  • ►  2013 (219)
    • ►  diciembre (7)
    • ►  noviembre (23)
    • ►  octubre (23)
    • ►  septiembre (22)
    • ►  agosto (18)
    • ►  julio (7)
    • ►  junio (10)
    • ►  mayo (23)
    • ►  abril (26)
    • ►  marzo (35)
    • ►  febrero (20)
    • ►  enero (5)
  • ►  2012 (203)
    • ►  diciembre (10)
    • ►  noviembre (36)
    • ►  octubre (32)
    • ►  septiembre (28)
    • ►  agosto (17)
    • ►  julio (17)
    • ►  junio (33)
    • ►  mayo (30)
Con la tecnología de Blogger.

Datos personales

Unknown
Ver todo mi perfil